The Trump Thread

Politics
1

Somehow I’ve ended up on the GOP email list [How the fuck did that happen?]

One I’ve just received says there’s a Trump Save America Rally tonight [Drumming up support for the Iowa mid-term elections].

How aware are you Americans of this rally?

The GOP email is the first I’ve heard of any Trump rally.

What have you guys heard?

Do I dare hope that this is the start of the big reveal? A signal that Team Trump and military patriots have completed the main part of their mission to take out the traitors?

That things are on course and The Plan is coming to it’s conclusion?

The War Thread 💥
The War Thread 💥
2

I’m not sure anymore with him what’s going on. I am sitting back , getting as much information out as I can to people, and just being aware honestly. I’m not going to dedicate myself to a anybody anymore. I’ve just been disappointed in the past. What I will do is be 50/50 on a lot of things but STILL honoring myself, my life, my commitments and do what I do.

I’ll reserve judgements until the end on trump and all of this. I HOPE im wrong and all this turns out to be some giant thing. but i dont think so. i think it’s more fundraising garbage so he can get more money and stuff lol. but who knows at this point.

all i can say is, the world is getting crazier out there. and i know people say “turn off the internet, go outside”. but that only makes you ignore what’s going on . you can only ignore something for so long before it becomes something bigger!

so I’ll sit back and watch how this unfolds. but still be leading a charge on information fronts, by bringing people together and getting out what I can. and of course, being prepared for any scenario :wink:

3

Yes I totally understand that attitude. It’s basically what I was advised to do re; ‘be the Observer’.

“Dedicate”? No. My allegiance will always be with the Light of All That Is Good and will support anyone who walks in the Light of Truth who oppose the Evil Ones.

Although I knew little about Trump before he threw his hat in the political ring [my impression from the Apprentice was that he was brash and a bit arrogant] I’ve not once seen or heard a false note or felt a single bad vibe from the man.

My respect for him grew over time as he represented America in a fitting manner of which should have made most Americans proud.

The fact is that he’s a patriot who loves his country and his fellow Americans. [Are we able to say the same about a single Demonrat or RINO?]

That alone should earn him respect.

There’s been enough evidence over the last couple of years for me to see that there is cause for hope.

If there’s one thing that I know about Americans is that the majority are patriots.

Trump is not alone. He has a team of patriots that includes many in the military.

One of the things that comes to mind came from Q; ‘Telling people is often not enough. Sometimes they have to be shown.’ [or words to that effect]

That’s exactly right. Who would have believed that politicians were capable of such evil?

We’re seeing the Lefts [traitorous Commie filth] intentions on a daily basis. If one is not really pissed off by now then they’ve not been paying attention.

People have had enough. Imagine the response should Trump make an emergency broadcast, instructing patriots to grab their guns and turn up for instruction under their local sheriff for example? [Not saying that will happen. Just speaking rhetorically . . . at this point]

Hundreds of thousands of armed patriotic citizens, if not millions - not to forget the millions of military veterans - would respond in an instant.

People are so fed up but don’t know how to act in response. All that’s needed would be a call to arms by someone they trusted.

Then the Evil Ones would shit themselves big time.

4

i agree with what you say, elric. really I do. and I do follow the light as well, but I do believe we have to wait and see what Trump was or still is. and i do believe he did a lot for the country to put us FIRST again. energy independence, not a dependence on foreign oil, called out nato for not paying their fair share, he called out china which NOBODY HAS EVER DONE before like he did. holy shit , he went wild dog on china. i liked that ALOT!!

but i dont really like him shilling for big pharma or he was pushing the vaccine so hard and all that. THAT really made me suspicious of him honestly. I do see where YOU are coming from . But i have gone from fan, to skeptic. we must all see if he’s legit? or just another plant. if he DOES turn out to be a plant or a stooge for the nwo or some shit like that? THAT will be it for people.

they put their faith in this man , and if he turns out to be some controlled despot ALL along? PEOPLE WILL BE PISSED royally. and that will be totally it for the elite. NONE of them will be able to walk, talk or go anywhere without being screamed at, things thrown at them, etc. people wont listen to a word any of them say .

it’s going to be an uphill battle elric. we have to remember to fight our battles where we need to! this is gonna be a big one! they are going HAM now! no holds barred.

we’ll have to see who he is for…

5

I’ve mentioned before that I clear negative entities [what the religious call demons]

There’s been times where an NE will pretend to be from the Light. When that occurs something doesn’t feel quite right so I test them basically by being a bit cheeky.

Those from the Light have a wonderful sense of humour. The Negative Ones take themselves way too seriously.

They’re unable to maintain their façade for long, eventually betraying themselves.

The same can be said of people. It’s impossible to keep up a fake appearance without letting the veil slip here and there.

That’s what I mean about Trump. He’s been 100% consistent.

My American internet friend has no doubts that Team Trump have been draining the Swamp under cover of this scamdemic and that he’ll return.

I really wish that I had her level of optimism though I am leaning in that direction. My intuition is the deciding factor.

Over the years since my spiritual awakening, I’ve learnt to pay particular attention to my intuition. At this point I’m not feeling doom [and considering the mass assault on humanity I’m wondering why I’m not] On the other hand I’m not feeling any sense of excitement that the hammer is about to drop either.

So, I’m sitting back and watching. Like we’ve all been saying, time will tell.

6

Just as Trump said which was portrayed by the MSM as a lie, is NOW having to back OFF as it is now more factual than myth, just as we suspected! There are many SPIES inside our own government agencies and they need to be routed out and executed for treason this would be a good start to clean out the scum in DC. which needs to become a viral internet cry
CLEAN DC NOW, rid them of the scumbags infesting our government! LOL

The Unstated Scandal: The CIA Collected Info On President Trump

On Friday, Special Counsel John Durham filed a motion relating to a defense firm’s potential conflict of interest in the Michael Sussmann case. The conflict itself is certainly intriguing, with Sussmann’s lawyers at Latham & Watkins LLP (Latham) having represented potential witnesses in the case, including Perkins Coie, former Perkins Coie (and Clinton Campaign general counsel) Marc Elias, the Hillary Clinton Campaign, and Hillary for America.

image

The issue that made more noise, however, was Durham’s disclosure that Rodney Joffe – a contractor with deep ties to the Clintons, and what appears to be a deep hatred for Trump – had exploited Executive Office of the President of the United States data he obtained from a “sensitive arrangement” with the U.S. Government to damage President Trump. Here is our initial post on the topic.

And here is the talented Lee Smith providing a great explanation on Tucker:

.@LeeSmithDC says he keeps hearing people comparing the scandal to Watergate when it doesn’t compare to Watergate at all. We are talking about some of the most secure communications in government been Surveiled by political operatives. pic.twitter.com/f22h5V92vV
— The Dirty Truth (Josh) (@AKA_RealDirty) February 15, 2022

Yet the data from the Executive Office of the President wasn’t all that Joffe had obtained. He also collected domain name system (DNS) internet traffic pertaining to a healthcare provider; Trump Tower; and Trump’s Central Park West apartment building.

image

Yesterday, February 14, Sussmann’s attorney’s disputed the Durham filing – to an extent. They said Sussmann provided the CIA with Executive Office of the President data from “when Barack Obama was president.”

I have a theory about this.

If Sussmann’s attorney is telling the truth (never a given), then we suspect the Executive Office of the President data included that from the 74 day the Trump transition period (between the November 8, 2016 election and the January 20, 2017 inauguration) – which would still be spying on the incoming Trump Administration.

For background, the Executive Office of the President includes a number of Executive councils (National Security Council, Office of Management and Budget, etc.) that support the President. It is involved generally in the transition from one president to the next.

What about the data involved with the Trump transition? On August 1, 2016, Trump reached an agreement with the General Services Administration (GSA) “for telecommunication and internet technology services for both the pre- and post-election transition period.”1 This is the agreement. I wonder if Joffe’s company, Neustar, helped the GSA in the execution of that agreement. Maybe. Maybe not. I’m not sure it matters, as Neustar already had an agreement to provide “DNS resolution services” to the Office of the Executive of the President.

Regardless, the “transition theory”, if we can call it that, matches the timeline in the Sussmann indictment, which states that Joffe and his team continued to target “Trump-related computer networks” in late 2016 and early 2017. And it makes sense in context of Sussmann’s conduct, as Sussmann tried to put this information out there in late December 2016.

image

Anyway, back to the point of this post.

According to Durham, Joffe and his associates manipulated that data to make it seem like Trump, and those in Trump’s world, had suspicious interactions with internet protocol (IP) addresses affiliated with a Russian mobile phone provider. They then combined those allegations with the Alfa Bank hoax materials (the subject of Sussmann’s Fall 2016 meeting with then-FBI General Counsel James Baker).

This damaging information, purporting to demonstrate at least circumstantial evidence of Trump/Russia collusion, was presented on February 9, 2017 to what Durham describes as U.S. Government “Agency-2.”

**That agency was the CIA.**We know for sure that Sussmann met with the CIA General Counsel. We learned in January 2022 that, if Sussmann is to be believed, there were two other CIA employees at that meeting.

In other words, a Clinton supporting contractor (Joffe) obtained sensitive information (perhaps unlawfully) about the Office of the President of the United States (Trump), manipulated the information, passed it to a DNC/Clinton lawyer (Sussmann), who then delivered it to the CIA.

All on American soil.

This is important because the CIA is generally prohibited from conducting domestic operations. The FBI explains:

“The CIA collects information only regarding foreign countries and their citizens. Unlike the FBI, it is prohibited from collecting information regarding ‘U.S. Persons,’ a term that includes U.S. citizens, resident aliens, legal immigrants, and U.S. corporations, regardless of where they are located.”

In the CIA’s own words:

“The FBI is responsible for coordination of clandestine collection of foreign intelligence through human sources or human-enabled means and counterintelligence activities inside the United States.”

Yet when it came to Trump, here was the CIA doing what it is prohibited: “collecting information regarding U.S. persons” inside the United States.2 (See also the CIA’s bulk surveillance program.)

A top CIA official answered the call of a DNC lawyer who alleged that these suspicious internet “lookups” proved “that Trump and/or his associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations.” Accusations that were baseless, according to Durham.

In other words, the secret police was more than willing to accept politically damaging information against the President. I’m curious what they did with it. It seems naive to think the information stayed at the CIA. I bet it was passed onto the FBI or DOJ, who may have used it to further the Trump/Russia investigation.

The scandal we are seeing come to light just isn’t about Hillary and Joffe and Sussmann. It’s not limited to Fusion GPS, FISA abuse, or Igor Danchenko.

It’s also about the willingness of U.S. intelligence to target the President. And on that topic, the CIA has some serious questions to answer.

* * *

1.Democracy Forward Found. v. U.S. Gen. Servs. Admin., 393 F. Supp. 3d 45, 48 (D.D.C. 2019).

  1. I can imagine the lazy pro-CIA rebuttals to this argument. They all ignore the dangers of CIA operations inside the U.S. and dismiss the jurisdiction of the various intelligence agencies. And let us be clear that CIA operations include collecting information.
7

I wonder when Clinton’s will arkancide this lawyer?

Speculation has emerged that the former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign’s tentacles reached into the Trump White House as part of the conspiracy to smear the 45th president.

On Friday, special prosecutor John Durham rattled the political world with a court filing that alleged lawyers for the Clinton campaign hired a technology company to infiltrate computer servers and lay a false trail that would implicate the Trump campaign of having contacts with Russia, according to Fox News.

Durham, hired to investigate the early stages of the Trump-Russia hoax and root out misconduct, has secured the indictment of Michael Sussman, a lawyer who represented the Clinton campaign, who has been accused of lying to the FBI. In November, Democratic operative Igor Danchenko, a contributor to a since-discredited dossier of claims concerning Trump, was charged with five counts of making false statements to the FBI.

8

The Biden campaign paid nearly $20,000 to a cybersecurity firm at the center of Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe.

The campaign paid Neustar Information Services in 2020 for accounting and compliance work, according to Federal Election Commission records. According to Durham, Neustar’s chief technology officer, Rodney Joffe, accessed sensitive web traffic data that the company maintained on behalf of the White House executive office in order to collect “derogatory” information about Donald Trump. Joffe allegedly provided the information to Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who in turn gave it to the CIA during a meeting in February 2017. Durham charged Sussmann in September with lying to the FBI about his investigation of Trump.

The Biden campaign’s payments raise questions about whether Joffe continued snooping on Trump in the most recent election. The Biden and Clinton campaigns are the only two presidential committees to have ever paid Neustar, according to Federal Election Commission records. Biden’s campaign paid Neustar $18,819 on Sept. 29, 2020, the records show. The Clinton campaign paid the firm $3,000 in May 2015 for mobile phone services. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee paid $3,000 to Neustar in 2017. Neustar executives and staffers contributed $17,906 to Biden’s campaign, FEC records show.

It is unclear what Neustar executives knew of Joffe’s activities on behalf of the Clinton campaign.

Durham alleges that Joffe and his associates “mined” the White House traffic data “for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.” Joffe, who retired from Neustar in September, allegedly told associates that he was investigating Trump in order to please “VIPs” on the Clinton campaign. He also allegedly wanted a job in the Hillary Clinton administration.

Joffe and Neustar have not been named in court filings for the Sussmann case, but Joffe’s attorneys have confirmed his involvement in the matter to news outlets. Joffe has not been charged with wrongdoing. Neustar and Joffe’s lawyer did not respond to requests for comment. The White House referred the Washington Free Beacon to the Democratic National Committee for comment. The organization did not respond.

Trump called for criminal charges against the operatives who sought out his digital dirt.

“This is a scandal far greater in scope and magnitude than Watergate and those who were involved in and knew about this spying operation should be subject to criminal prosecution,” Trump said.

Durham alleged in a court filing on Friday that Joffe and his associates “exploited” domain name system Internet traffic for the White House executive office, Trump Tower, and Trump’s apartment building in Manhattan. They had access to the data through what Durham said is Neustar’s “sensitive arrangement” to provide web services to the White House executive office.

Durham alleges that Joffe and his associates “mined” the White House traffic data “for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.” Joffe, who retired from Neustar in September, allegedly told associates that he was investigating Trump in order to please “VIPs” on the Clinton campaign. He also allegedly wanted a job in the Hillary Clinton administration.

Sussmann allegedly provided the CIA with data showing contacts between Trump associates and users of a Russian mobile phone provider. Sussmann told the spy agency the contacts were rare and suspicious, according to Durham. The prosecutor disputed that claim, saying there were millions of contacts with users of the Russian provider, including from the Obama White House.

Joffe began helping the Clinton campaign in mid-2016 after he found what he claimed was suspicious Internet chatter between the servers of Russia’s Alfa Bank and Trump’s real estate company, the Trump Organization. Sussmann shared Joffe’s findings with journalists and then-FBI general counsel James Baker. Sussmann is accused of lying to Baker during a Sept. 19, 2016, meeting by denying that he was investigating Trump on behalf of the Clinton campaign.

According to Durham, Clinton campaign lawyers told campaign officials, including Jake Sullivan, about the Alfa Bank claims. Sullivan later joined the Biden campaign and currently serves as national security adviser. His wife is counselor to Attorney General Merrick Garland, who oversees the Durham probe and has final say over a release of a report of the investigation.

Federal investigators have debunked Joffe’s allegations of secret channels of communication between Trump and Russia. The Justice Department inspector general said the FBI determined by February 2017 that there was no basis to the Alfa-Trump allegation. Durham said in his court filing on Friday that his investigators found “no support” for the information Sussmann gave the CIA.

9

Our ENTIRE political system is CORRUPT and all they know how to do is LIE, I say hang-em ALL and start over, LAWYERS first!

The 5 Lies The Media Told About The Latest Special Counsel Revelations

by Jeff Miller

February 18, 2022

OPINION: This article contains commentary which may reflect the author’s opinion

John Durham filed his motion a week ago in the criminal case against former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann. In that motion, which requested the court to seek Sussmann’s waiver of any conflicts held by his lawyers on record, the purported conflicts were described in detail in excruciating detail.

According to the report, “enemies of Donald Trump surveilled the internet traffic at Trump Tower, at his New York City apartment building, and later at the executive office of the president of the United States, then fed disinformation about that traffic to intelligence agencies hoping to frame Trump as a Russia-connected stooge.”

Earlier Durham filings revealed similarly explosive facts, but the special counsel’s motion generated enough attention that #Durham started trending on Twitter. It has been almost a decade since the special counsel’s office indicted Sussmann for lying to James Baker, the FBI’s former general counsel, for the Durham investigation to reach the legacy press.

Mainstream media tended to ignore the latest developments, portraying Friday’s filing as meaningless and presenting several false narratives-just as it did when news broke that the Clinton campaign lawyer had been indicted.

A Monday article by Charlie Savage at the New York Times was headlined, “Court Filing Started a Furor in Right-Wing Outlets, but Their Narrative Is Off Track.” Savage’s arguments mirrored those of Sussmann’s lawyers in a document filed with the court the same day.

In Vanity Fair’s top story on Tuesday, Savage’s “analysis” was quoted. In Jimmy Kimmel’s show that evening, the talking points were turned into one-liners. Brian Stelter of CNN further echoed what Savage was saying at the New York Times.

Despite MSM’s efforts to advance the non-official defense of a former lawyer for the Clinton campaign, their narratives are rubbish. Here are their talking points and why they’re wrong.

1. It’s Nutty Right-Wingers

The first salvo of Savage’s Sussmann counter-offensive, Savage stated that Durham’s filing on Friday night “set off a furor among right-wing outlets about purported spying on former President Donald J. Trump.”

To frame the furor as right-wing serves as an easy way for a corrupt media to disregard the substance of the report. Steller likewise repeated this theme in an article for CNN: “Right-wing media said it was exposing a scandal. What it really revealed is how bad information spreads in MAGA world.”

Additionally, Hillary Clinton took the right-wing angle, tweeting that “Trump & Fox are desperately spinning up a fake scandal to distract from his real ones.”

2. Don’t Read The Document

Savage’s second narrative, quickly repeated by his contemporaries, is that it’s impossible to decipher the nuances of Durham’s most recent court filing unless readers use their intelligence.

The facts “also tend to involve dense and obscure issues, so dissecting them requires asking readers to expend significant mental energy and time—raising the question of whether news outlets should even cover such claims,” he wrote in his free public relations article for Sussmann.

3. There Was No Scary ‘Infiltration’

Durham’s Friday filing was countered by Fox News’ coverage and its opening that read, “A filing from Special Counsel John Durham found that lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to ‘infiltrate’ servers at Trump Tower and the White House to establish ‘inferences’ and a ‘narrative’ to connect Donald Trump to Russia.”.

However, Durham never used the word “infiltrate” in that reply. On this point, those on the left have at least a little something: Durham did not say “infiltrate.” In fact, Kash Patel, a former investigator for Devin Nunes on the House Intelligence Committee, mentioned that word in the interview with Fox News, the article explained.

4. Trump Wasn’t President at the Time

In an attempt to minimize the importance of the disclosures in Durham’s motion, a narrative centered on the data Sussmann released to the CIA that claimed: “Russian-made smartphones, called YotaPhones, had been connecting to networks at Trump Tower and the White House, among other places.”

As for the White House, the data “came from Barack Obama’s presidency,” according to two lawyers who represented one of the researchers who assisted Joffe. However, “to our knowledge,” the lawyers stated, “all of the data they used was nonprivate DNS data from before Trump took office.”

5. It’s Old News

As Savage’s fifth response, he proposed that the “news” was “old news.”

“But the entire narrative appeared to be mostly wrong or old news,” Savage wrote in the Times piece. In a later section, he stressed that point again: “for one, much of this was not new: The New York Times had reported in October what Mr. Sussmann had told the C.I.A. about data suggesting that Russian-made smartphones, called YotaPhones, had been connecting to networks at Trump Tower and the White House, among other places.”

However, it was Savage himself who mentioned the YotaPhones passingly in an article published on October 1, 2021, that focused primarily on the Alfa Bank charges.

We should have anticipated Durham’s latest revelations since they were handed over to the Sussmann-friendly reporters who wrote the October article, in what now appears to be an attempt by Sussmann’s legal team to get ahead of the bad news that was sure to come.

10

CIA are scumbags.

11

[quote=“Tulluck”]CIA are scumbags.
[/quote]

The CIA along with others are the worst of the lot and have caused more worldwide damage with there ploys to change leadership of countries in many ways. They control much of the drug trade for their black-ops monies.

12

I am to the point that Democrats should be banned from the USA and a open hunting season should be established for them with PAID bounties for them ! WOULD THAT NOT turn some HEADS around! LOL

If we ever get our country back I’ll file a bill for this to take effect!

Trump Accused Of Engaging In ‘Criminal Conspiracy’

imageby Kari Donovan

March 3, 2022

OPINION: This article contains commentary which may reflect the author’s opinion

The lapdog media, also known as the “mainstream media” is happily reporting that Donald J. Trump may have committed a crime in his effort to keep the 2020 presidential election results from being certified, the House committee investigating the events on the Capitol said in a court filing Wednesday evening.

If this were happening with a Republican-led House Committee against a Democrat who was a former President, we all know that the media would run with the story of obvious political persecution.

The latest leftist attack on the former Republican president, by his Democrat political opponents, came from John Eastman documents. Eastman is the lawyer charged with drafting the strategy for the Jan. 6 certification.

The Democrat-dominated US House panel said that Trump and Eastman had worked together to try to convince then-Vice President Mike Pence to obstruct Congress’s certification of the Electoral College votes.

“Had this effort succeeded, the electoral count would have been obstructed, impeded, influenced, and (at the very least) delayed, all without any genuine legal justification and based on the false pretense that the election had been stolen. There is no genuine question that the President and Plaintiff attempted to accomplish this specific illegal result,” the committee wrote in its filing.

The committee also claims it “has a good-faith basis for concluding that the President and members of his Campaign engaged in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the United States.”

The Hill reported that a spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“The accusations are the most serious that the committee has leveled against Trump so far,” the Hill reported.

The allegations filed on Wednesday are not formal charges nor do they indicate that the former president could face criminal prosecution, but they signal that the committee has set its sights at the highest levels in probing what led up to the events on January 6, 2021, at the US Capitol.

“The filing came in response to Eastman’s lawsuit seeking to block the committee’s subpoena for his private communications, which he has argued are privileged, in part because of his legal work on behalf of the former president,” The Hill reported.

But the committee argues that Eastman, an attorney for the Trump campaign, may not claim his conversations with the former president are covered by attorney-client privilege, partly because legal advice rendered with the intention of committing a crime is not protected.

In the Wednesday filing, they asked the judge to review requested records personally in order to determine whether they fall under the crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege.

“The Select Committee’s brief refutes on numerous grounds the privilege claims Dr. Eastman has made to try to keep hidden records critical to our investigation. The Select Committee is not conducting a criminal investigation. But, as the judge noted at a previous hearing, Dr. Eastman’s privilege claims raise the question whether the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege applies in this situation,” Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) said in a statement.

“We believe evidence in our possession justifies review of these documents under this exception in camera. The facts we’ve gathered strongly suggest that Dr. Eastman’s emails may show that he helped Donald Trump advance a corrupt scheme to obstruct the counting of electoral college ballots and a conspiracy to impede the transfer of power.”

“While the committee does not have prosecution power, it’s planning to release a report of its findings, which could be formally referred to the Justice Department, which could then weigh whether to pursue any charges. But the extraordinary accusation indicates the breadth of evidence that the committee has obtained in its investigation into the riot at the Capitol and the events leading to it,” The Hill reported.

The filing includes depositions with a number of high-ranking former Trump officials, including those who worked for Pence, like his national security advisor Keith Kellogg and Pence’s White House counsel Greg Jacob, who opposed plans to have Pence buck his ceremonial duties to certify the election results.

The documents also include heated emails between Eastman and Jacob, who criticized him for forwarding legal advice that “functioned as a serpent in the ear of the President of the United States.”

“Respectfully it was gravely, gravely irresponsible for you to entice the President with an academic theory that had no legal viability, and that you well know would lose before any judge who decided the case,” Jacob wrote.

In an earlier email, Jacob wrote he did not believe “there is a single justice on the United States Supreme Court” who is as “broad minded” as Eastman, saying his plan didn’t fit within “every legal trail placed before me.”

It also includes a transcript of the deposition with Eastman, during which he invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination 146 times. He has also been ordered by the court to review 1,500 of his emails a day for content that might be covered by executive privilege.

It’s still unclear how the judge in the case will rule on Eastman’s privilege claims. A hearing for the case is scheduled for Tuesday.

13

Interesting how they’re totally disinterested in Hildebeasts very long list of crimes. Or Creepy Joes. Loud Mouth Maxine. Or Schifty. Nanschy. Kerry. . . .

Shit, it’s a very long list.

When Julian Assange was asked why Wikileaks had not exposed any dirt on Trump he said “There isn’t any”.

14

YUP,
The GUILTY DOG always BARKS FIRST!

15

Trump Obliterates Biden In 4 Words After Calling MAGA ‘Most Extreme’

Former President Trump on Thursday told Fox News Digital that “MAGA is saving America,” and slammed President Biden for being “divisive” when he called MAGA the “most extreme political organization that’s existed in recent American history.”

“MAGA is saving America,” Trump told Fox News. “Our country is going to hell. MAGA is saving America.”

“Inflation, incompetent withdrawals from Afghanistan, leaving hostages horribly wounded, soldiers, $85 billion of military equipment – MAGA is saving America,” Trump continued.

The former president said the U.S. is “no longer respected throughout the world.”

“Ukraine should have never happened,” Trump said, declaring that “Russia would have never gone into Ukraine” under his leadership.

“MAGA is saving our country,” Trump said again.

Trump’s comments are in response to Biden, who, reacting Wednesday to the leaked draft opinion signaling the Supreme Court’s intent to overturn Roe v. Wade, slammed Republicans, saying the controversy is “about a lot more than abortion.” Biden said the “MAGA crowd” is “the most extreme political organization that’s existed in recent American history.”

16

this is going to be interesting. I haven’t really supported him since he started pushing the vaccine and saying the comments about what’s happening in ukraine is “genocide” on fox and friends…so we’ll see what his play is here.

anything is better than this dumbass in office right now soo, not sure.

17

[quote=“Skyrison”]this is going to be interesting. I haven’t really supported him since he started pushing the vaccine and saying the comments about what’s happening in ukraine is “genocide” on fox and friends…so we’ll see what his play is here.

anything is better than this dumbass in office right now soo, not sure. [/quote]

YUP,
Something is not quite correct about that!

18

I was for the guy initially , but the way he’s been coming at DeSantis lately is really nerve racking. wtf? he’s calling him out saying he has a holier than thou outlook and stuff. He’s saying he’s slow and all this garbage. why would he do this? Does he view him as a threat? This is going to divide people much more. Especially in the republican party. Trump needs to start being quiet sometimes. I liked the whole thing he did before but eh, I’m over it now.

What’s his angle?

BTW, MUCH easier to start threads not having a list to scroll through when I select a category!

19

im honestly not sure wtf is going on. it’s…odd. I will admit o.O

20

he just called him out hardcore in a HUGE filled rant! WTF?