Catholic and Protestant doctrine is known as Pauline Theology [As opposed to Johannite Theology] because doctrine is based on Saul/Pauls writings.
So who was Saul/Paul?
He was a Jew who held Roman citizenship.
He actually worked for the Romans so he was a traitor to his own people. He also persecuted the early Christians.
In fact Saul/Paul was travelling to Damascus to deliver a Roman order to arrest Christians there when he claimed to have had a miraculous conversion when the ‘resurrected’ Jesus spoke to him.
Ever since I was a kid I had issues with this story.
Like all Biblical stories about goat herders interactions with ‘the Lord’ and ‘God’, I often wondered what made them so special? Why has not God shown himself or spoken to any of us since?
Off course the adults assured me that was because one ‘must have faith’, without which one would go to ‘the bottom pit of Hell’. How is that even fair? Why was the same not expected of the goat herders then?
Why does God not treat us all equally?
The weekly prayer in church that said in part “Though I am unworthy to eat the crumbs under Thy table” certainly did nothing to help my belief that God treated us with a contemptuous attitude.
We are expected to take the word of a Roman sympathiser who worked against his own people that the ‘resurrected’ Jesus chose Saul/Paul to be his Apostle. Sure he did.
Why would not God at least choose a man that displayed moral integrity, someone who had the respect and admiration of his peers? Why did He/She choose to pick a grub instead?
Saul/Paul admits that he had not ever met Rabbi Jesus in real life and even more astoundingly he admits that he had no idea of the Rabbis teachings.
That’s why he just made shit up.
Saul/Paul ADMITS that he’s a bald faced liar but that’s perfectly acceptable apparently.
He was called out as a liar so often that he felt the need to justify his bald-faced lies by saying that ‘lying for the Lord’ is a good thing if it “furthers Gods glory”.
In-other-words Saul/Paul is saying that the ends justifies the means. Ugh.
The Rabbis students were so outraged at Saul/Pauls misrepresentation of the Rabbis teachings that they confronted him demanding that he ‘cease and desist’.
This is WHY Saul/Paul fled to Greece where they loved a ripping good yarn about Sons of God [There were plenty of Sons of Gods at the time] who had supernatural powers.
It’s been said that since Saul/Paul was in Greece he felt the need to fictionalise the Rabbis ‘miracles’ to make his ‘Son of God’ more powerful than other competing Sons of God.
Johannite Theology is Christian doctrine according to John as practiced by the Cathars.
John not only was a close friend of Rabbi Jesus but he also studied at the Rabbis feet.
Saul/Paul did not know the Rabbi from a bar of soap and admits to being ignorant of his teachings.
One was an honest man who knew the Rabbi personally.
The other an obvious fraud.
Which leads to an obvious question; why on earth would the church choose the latters’ version?
Johannite theology makes way more sense than the Pauline version.
The Cathars were a peaceful people. Despite not being evangelical [rather they chose to live by the edict "live your life like a shining light’ to attract converts] they were becoming quite popular and were gaining converts.
The RCC did not like that so Pope Innocent III embarked on a 20 year campaign against the Cathars.
Pope Innocent told his army that as Gods representative on Earth, they were absolved of any crime they committed against these peaceful people who offered little resistance.
The Popes army raped and slaughtered men, women, children and babies. No one was offered any mercy.
The Albigensian Crusade was one of the most violent and reprehensible campaigns against innocents in the churches history.
These were the very same people who compiled the Bible from numerous sources and constructed Christian doctrine and who’ve been messing with it ever since.
Books were removed in their entirety, often based on a whim.
There’s over 14,800 CHANGES between the early Sinai Bible and the KJV alone.
Hardly what I’d call reliable that does not support the claim that "every word’ was “inspired by the Holy Ghost”.
