I haven’t spent much time on this and I did pray for Charlie that night but I watched some of his wife’s speech last night and the way she talked about how he was still with us seemed a little odd to me, as was her focus on how the assoc. will continue and the tour is not cancelled.
I wonder about some things I see. My first reaction was there should have been more blood
and that the stream of “blood” should have sprayed out wider.
Now, this person doesn’t raise another question I’m asking, but there is slow-mo and you can see how his shirt moved.
Considering the angle at high-upward angle from point of impact necessary to deflect immediately UP into neck, the shooter would have had to been lower than Kirk. If the bullet was fired from an elevagted long-distance trajectory, it would have deflcted sideways or down.
Grok has once again been caught spreading blatant misinformation on X. In several bizarre exchanges, the chatbot repeatedly claimed that Charlie Kirk was “fine” and that gruesome videos of his assassination were a “meme edit.”
[/no-embed]
I really have been avoiding spending time on this one. I don’t EVER go looking for these “issues”, but neither will I ignore them.
I am not presenting an opinion either, and I really can’t afford to spend much time on this.
I’m not going to watch graphic videos of the event. I haven’t even watched the one with all the blood coming out and don’t intend to, however, yes, there has been lots of talk of anomalies in the videos. Now, one of the way that these are explained by some people, in technical terms, is that the videos were taken with smart phones and a lot of these phones, when recording video, supposedly use AI (although I’ve not yet delved into the details, despite such things [video compression and AI] being one of my areas of knowledge) in order to compress the video more (so-called CODECs), and these new CODECs apparently try to predict frames in advance (for purposes of compression) through use of AI and therefore weird things often happen. In other words, such video cannot be considered a reliable reproduction of reality. It mostly “gets it right”, but often it does not, and, indeed AI will make mistakes (an inherent part of AI neural net models.) Without even going down the AI video compression route, I can tell you that previously existing CODECs (used by every device, whether it be a professional camera, video camera, consumer camera, security camera or phone camera, ALL make use of what is known as lossy compression in all of their CODECs, and that even these (non-AI) CODECs do indeed lose information (sometimes a lot of information) and can often misrepresent images. In other words, they are an unreliable representation of reality, especially when the CODECs attempt to use high compression rates (which is often the case with mobile devices.)
honestly? this is a non issue for me and I don’t think it’s even worth anything looking into. The guy is dead and we lost a good one. I think it does a disservice to him and instances like this to think it’s fake. he was killed, murdered…by a crazy mother fucker that was radicalized. Charlie was killed for his political opinion. simple as that. it’s terrorism
she said that because they are both highly religious. She is saying he will always be with us in spirit, and she wants his legacy to march on, as his supporters would want as well. i watched the speech too. She is arguably even MORE religious than he is. I think I read they both believe in ascension and that nobody is ever truly ‘gone’ even if they are physically dead. highly religious people believe the person that is dead physically is still here in some form.
and she is right in a way. charlie WILL always be with us. his legacy will fight on and people are going to be awakening more than ever. the left doesn’t know what they did. that guy who shot him fucked up HARDCORE and even if there was some “plan to off him” by elites and dark forces? they fucked up HUGE. looks like charlie had a much much bigger following and effect on this world than even I knew about. this is going to light a fire under a lot of people that were otherwise docile and passive
[quote=“Treebeard”]what about the issues I asked about. I need to establish them before I even believe he was killed.
i suspect Robinson could have been put up to it (patsy) by cia mossad (same thing now) or Mormons.
Mormons run Utah. They are notorious crisis actors. Seriously. Robinson is a Mormon. I already knew that before I had to check it out, and yup.
I never thought of Kirk as anything but a product and invention of his funding by Zionists and others associated with them.[/quote]
wait, you don’t believe he was killed? why? It’s only been a few days since his death. can people just cool it with the “is he dead bro?” stuff for at least a couple of months? I find it a bit slanderous personally. especially THIS early on. as they say “too soon man”. I have seen multiple theories though and I think that the human mind sometimes tries to connect dots where there are none as a bit of a trauma coping mechanism. because we try to comprehend what just happened. the human mind is LOGIC for many. so it’s trying to overanalyze at all times.
But ya know what? most of the time things happen as simple as that. people shoot each other, and there are evil scumbags everywhere. he got shot. he’s gone.
nah man. there’s no looking into it. he’s gone. and the reason why there isn’t a blood trail or “more blood” is because it hit his main artery that goes to the brain. he lost a pint or two of blood in the first 3 seconds, even before he dropped. it was like a pressure valve being released. possibly one of the worst places you can be hit when shot.
[quote=“Skyrison”]wait, you don’t believe he was killed? why? It’s only been a few days since his death. can people just cool it with the “is he dead bro?” stuff for at least a couple of months? I find it a bit slanderous personally. especially THIS early on. as they say “too soon man”. I have seen multiple theories though and I think that the human mind sometimes tries to connect dots where there are none as a bit of a trauma coping mechanism. because we try to comprehend what just happened. the human mind is LOGIC for many. so it’s trying to overanalyze at all times.
But ya know what? most of the time things happen as simple as that. people shoot each other, and there are evil scumbags everywhere. he got shot. he’s gone.[/quote]
I don’t really have an opinion yet. But somehow I knew Robinson would be a Mormon and I get the feeling he’s cooperating for a reason.
The issues I have are described in first post. Now I’m starting to wonder if that jet which fell off radar might have had Charlie on it.
[quote=“Treebeard”]I don’t really have an opinion yet. But somehow I knew Robinson would be a Mormon and I get the feeling he’s cooperating for a reason.
The issues I have are described in first post. Now I’m starting to wonder if that jet which fell off radar might have had Charlie on it.[/quote]
you’re reading too much into this tree. there’s no opinion to form whether or not he’s dead. the guy got shot for speaking out and trying to have open and civil discourse with those he agreed on. I think the people implying he’s “not dead bro” are actually feeding the frenzy right into the hands of those that want us to be more divided. we have to focus on going forward and uniting to deal with all of these fuckers
Unfortunately I learned a long time ago and have been confirmed multiple times that in this day and age, things can be done, it is best not to accept events on face value, as tempting as it feels to go with emotions, that is what they depend on. Focus on my questions in the first post, watch the video. There’s about 3-4 issues described there and until they are resolved I feel the questions exist.
If people REALLY want to look into this, I would suggest not focusing on the jet having kirk on it or not. but if it was a foreign entity or cia sniper that took him out , then bugged out on the jet. THAT would be much more believable than some wwe style ketchup packet of kirk making explode under his skin, then…for some reason…making it look like he was killed for “reasons”. I think people have to be rational about some of these conspiracies sometimes. and I think some people already conjuring up “is he dead yet or no!” are doing him a disservice.
there are conspiracies that are true, yes. but sometimes terrible things DO just happen. I think sometimes we get so caught up in analyzing this stuff, some people don’t even see the fact in front of them. and just want it to be what they want. I would have thought at LEAST people would have waited a month or so after his death to start with this “OMG IS HE DEAD OR NOT” type of stuff. but here we are 2 days after and ..yeah. sooo. I don’t think it’s honorable
there will be a ton of things that probably go around like this. just please be cautious. the ones in charge of certain things will take advantage of THIS event and try to divide!
The guy is almost certainly dead, however I have noticed some odd things. For instance …
1] It was a 33 hour manhunt, according to the FBI and media
2] The assassin had a $33,000 scholarship
I’d not be surprised if there are MORE 33s that are involved in the whole affair.
For those who pay attention they will also know that for certain groups (such as in high level elite Freemasonry), certain numbers have a significance and these same numbers are used as a “calling card” during significant events. When I first heard them mention “33 manhunt”, it immediately caught my attention but then I didn’t pay further attention because it was just one occurrence, but now there are 2. Are there more?
If you stop and look at his shirt, would it behave that way? Stop the bitchute vid at 1:26, notice 1.26-1.28.
Then, again from the side, 6.40-6.44, compare with what happens afterward. It’s odd.
Maybe we can talk more about this again after some time has passed.
[quote=“Treebeard”]If you stop and look at his shirt, would it behave that way? Stop the bitchute vid at 1:26, notice 1.26-1.28.
Then, again from the side, 6.40-6.44, compare with what happens afterward. It’s odd.
Maybe we can talk more about this again after some time has passed.[/quote]
I took a look and I would have to say that it does not fall outside of what I would expect as per my initial statement. It is consistent with video CODEC compression artefacting.